Peer Review Policy

Olympus Open employs a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and transparency of the research published in its journals. This policy is designed to uphold high standards of scholarly review across all fields covered by the journals under Olympus Open.

Overview of Peer Review Process

The peer review process followed by Olympus Open journals is double-blind, maintaining the anonymity of both authors and reviewers. The process includes:

Initial Manuscript Evaluation: The Editorial Team evaluates submissions for relevance, originality, and adherence to the journal's guidelines.
Reviewer Selection: Independent experts in the relevant field are assigned to assess the manuscripts thoroughly.
Review and Recommendation: Reviewers provide unbiased feedback, focusing on the manuscript's methodology, results, and conclusions.
Editorial Decision: The Editorial Team makes a final decision based on the reviewers' evaluations and communicates this to the authors along with any necessary feedback.

Roles and Responsibilities

Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality of publications by providing comprehensive and constructive feedback while adhering to ethical standards of confidentiality and objectivity. Authors are responsible for ensuring their work is original, properly acknowledging others' contributions, and disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical Guidelines

The peer review process follows strict ethical guidelines, emphasizing confidentiality, objectivity, and transparency. Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and maintain the confidentiality of the manuscripts they evaluate.

Commitment to Transparency and Integrity

Olympus Open is committed to a transparent and ethical peer review process, ensuring that each submission is evaluated fairly based on its academic merit. This policy reflects the company’s dedication to promoting rigorous research and disseminating valuable knowledge across various fields.